Month: March 2004

  • Well darn.


    I know I wanted to post something the other day when Xanga was down for their unscheduled(?) maintanence… It must have been unscheduled, because what kind of genius schedules maintence on a weekend? And then I didn’t have time to post yesterday, so I forgot what I wanted to say.


    Must have been a lie. heh


    Thanks for the birthday wishes all, and the birthday consolations. You know, I got $125 for my b-day and I have $45 left… where the heck did it all go? Lessee, I put gas in the car, bought dinner for the family one night, I bought three books (less than $20 in all), bought a gift card for someone else’s b-day… I can’t think of anything else, but it doesn’t seem like it should be $80. lol


    I think I finally finished monkeying with the smilie bar for the comments page. All I did while Xanga was down was seek out new smilies. The smilie bar might change here and there, but for the most part, I think 77 different smilies is enough. lol I found a pretty good free image hosting site too… Photobucket. Feel free to right-click on my smilies and save them for your own smilie bar.


    OK, I’m gonna go lie down before work and try to kill this headache…

  • What a horrible birthday…


    I had insomnia for two days before my birthday, so by the day of my birthday, I was bone weary. (The insomnia had nothing to do with my birthday. I just couldn’t sleep.) 


    My only intended purchase for the day was a DVD player, which the salesperson insisted would be compatible with my TV and VCR. It’s not. Apparently, the fates have decreed that I am not meant to have a DVD player.


    We went out to red lobster for lunch -it’s an annual practice for our family. My mother is a lobster junkie. We go every year for my birthday and three weeks later for hers. It was disgusting. We invited my granma along, and while I love her, she’s not the kind of person you want to take out. I swear the conversations we get into, plus she’s hard of hearing and talks overly loud. We talked about religion, bodily functions, gay marriage, and pedophilia. Reminds me of when I was a kid and she’d ask me on a fairly regular basis if I’d had a bowel movement. lol I’m surprised we weren’t asked to leave.


    They seated us, then made us get up because no one had cleaned off the table from the previous diners. We didn’t care, they could have just took the stuff away and let us sit… whatever. We ordered, and the caesar salad they brought my mother was all soggy like it had been left in the fridge overnight. Yuck. My garden salad was about the best thing of my meal. Then we waited for lunch, and waited and waited. The server even came out and apologized for the wait. When he finally brought the food, it was over cooked and dry.


    I guess we’ll be going somewhere else for my mom’s b-day. Every year it’s been getting worse, but I think this year was the last straw. The only one happy with the meal was my granma, but since her sense of smell and taste have always been weak, it’s no wonder she liked it.


    So, since my DVD player and VCR couldn’t play nice with my TV, I went to kmart today to see if maybe they had something that would adapt everything. Well, they were out of adapters, and while I didn’t really have the money, they had a 27in RCA on sale for less than $200. Since my TV is a 19in Daewoo almost 10yrs old, I figured it might be about time I got a new one and kill two birds with one stone.


    I got the TV home, hooked it all up, and IT DIDN’T WORK! Wahhhhhhhhh!


    So I returned it. I’ll return the DVD player when I head into work today. I give up. I declare my home a 21st century technology free zone. Blah. I’m gonna go live in a cave with my computer and 56 K modem.


    Anyway… sorry for not posting the Newsletter yesterday…


    A lady was into the bookstore where I work the other day, asking after the elements. So I thought I’d write up an article on them in case any one else had any questions. I also included some information on the elementals for good measure. The Sites of Interest also deal with the elements and elementals, so be sure to check them out.


    Long time readers of the newsletter may have noticed a few changes. For instance, I recently added a in-site search engine. Now you can search through every page on my site for the subject you need. Also, the main index page now has a link to the Newsletter Archive rather than the newest newsletter. On the Archive page, the newest newsletter is indicated by an icon. Finally, nowhere on my site is my email located any more. (I was getting a lot of spam.) So instead, the contact link now points to a forum at yahoogroups. I’d also like to start up an “advice column,” so if anyone has any questions or needs advice or help with a spell, feel free to drop me a note at AskCandace.

     

    *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~* Index *~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*

    Some Sites of Interest

    Year 2004 of Chinese Astrology Green Monkey Year
    Elements of Personality
    Order of the White Lion
    Nature Spirits ~ Devas ~ Elementals ~ Trees
    *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*


    This Pagan Week : March
    Humor : Compulsive Talkers
    Article : Elements and Elementals
    Quote : Ludwig Wittgenstein
    Craft of the Week : Doily Daisy Pens
    Humor : A Grave Undertaking
    Who’s Who in World Mythology : Amathaounta
    Quote : Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
    The Magi’s Garden : Catnip
    Cartoon
    Poem : The Beatles
    Quote : Zen Master Dogen
    The Power of Stones : Bloedite
    Humor : Did you hear about the sword-swallower who was on a diet?
    A Dreamer’s Guide : Nobel Prize to Nosegay
    Quote : James Allen
    Previous Newsletters

  • I get news articles delivered to my email. They get plucked from the internet by google’s nimble electro-golems based on keywords I have chosen. It’s kind of a useless process because usually the keywords are used rather randomly in the text.


    For instance, I set google to deliver news articles with the keywords “giant squid.” So I get articles from restaurant critics and gourmet menus. Not at all what I’m looking for, but then, giant squid are a rarity. I can’t expect articles on the subject to appear with any frequency.


    Some of the other keywords I use are Pagan, Paganism, Witchcraft, etc. You’d think that I’d get a lot more articles on these topics, yes? Oh no… For instance, Pagan keeps bringing up articles about some athlete. He could be famous… I don’t know. The closest I get to liking any sport is occasionally watching gymnastics if I’m surfing the channels and I can’t find anything else. All that flipping and jumping and twisting is amazing. I wish I could do that. You don’t even want to know what occult brings up. Ewwww


    But anyway, I digress. Keyword Pagan also brought up an article which has little to do with Paganism.


    How many plan on seeing The Passion? I won’t. I’m not really curious about it. The only Christian movie I ever got into was Jesus Christ Superstar. heh That is a great movie.


    I go more for sci-fi, fantasy, horror, comedy movies. I really don’t care for these docu-dramas, though it is kind of cool that “The Passion” is done in all the original languages with subtitles.


    But anyway, I digress again. The subject of the article really has no bearing on my beef with its content. And not even all the content, just a few generalizations which irk me.


    The article was written by a Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, mostly in defense of what he refered to has “gross defamation.” I can see that. Media has a dual purpose of entertainment and education. If it’s not one, it’s the other. Since I cannot see such graphic “historical” depiction to be entertainment, especially when every Christian under the sun idolizes the main character, it must therefore be educational in nature. If the movie is meant to be educational, it really can’t be a good thing for the jews who he says are depicted as having ”demonically demanded the death of Christ.” I can completely understand where critics of the movie are coming from in regards to its ability to incite anti-semetic feelings. I agree with the critics. In my opinion, it should not have been made. There are too many people who will take it as fact and not an artistic interpretation of a psuedo-historic event.


    But still, it was the wording of the first page of the article itself which caught my attention. For instance, Rabbi Boteach said the movie depicted Christianity as “a religion of blood, gore, and death.” I’m sorry… but isn’t it? Historically speaking that is, since this is an “historical” movie… Then he said that Christianity should be depicted as a religion of “blessing, love, and life.” Yeah, well, shoulda, coulda, woulda. Best case scenerio, it’s supposed be those things. In my experience though, it seldom is. Most Christians view life as a chore to be performed before they earn enough creds to get into Heaven.

    The part that really caught my attention however was this…”The pagan religious cults of the ancient world were focused almost entirely on death. Ancient Egypt, with its pyramids as Temples of death, its worship of the god Hades, and its mass embalming of mummies, saw the purpose of life as gaining entry into the afterlife.” Now that was a gross generalization. Very few were focused on death, but rather on Life after death. The Rabbi can’t even keep his gods straight. Hades is a Greek god. Osiris would be the Egyptian god of the underworld. Blah! Grrr!


    And he goes on to talk about Islam and Shintoism and Hinduism: “In Hinduism, death is so central a facet that up until about 100 years ago when a man died they put his living widow on the funeral pyre with him.” Yeah, bad practice that, glad they don’t do that any more… but he fails to mention that Hindis believe in reincarnation. Therefore it is still not a “death cult” as he seems to want to make any religion which is not of the Judeo-Christian persuasion.


    I guess my gut reaction to this article is that the author was trying deflect criticism of Judaism and Christianity by criticizing other religions with half-truths and outright ignorance. Really I have no problem with either branch of monotheism, nor with their sibling Islam either, but I really feel the writer should have done his research before (unintentionally?) attacking other religions to put his own in a better light. What should I expect of someone whose scholarship lies in his own and related religions. Far be it for him to actually study religions not related to his own in some way.


    Rabbi Shmuley Boteach ends on page one by saying “Judaism and Christianity must therefore be supremely careful not to emulate their pagan predecessors and become religions that put the focus on death rather than on life.” I’d have to say it’s too late. Really, that’s all Christianity is about… getting to go to the big party at the end of the game. It’s been that way since before the middle ages, but was cemented by men like Martin Luther (not King! lol) among others. Really, Christianity and (dare I make a blanket statement) Judaism have been anti-flesh since Adam and Eve. In their religion, the flesh and blood world is unclean and death is to be favored over the filth and degradation of life (though suicide is a big no-no if you want the grandprize). Howso are they not religions of death then, when they reject life so vehemently? Perhaps I have misunderstood their stance on the afterlife, but it seems to be favored far above their existence in this world.


    He goes on to talk about the movie and the difference between Christianity and Judaism… none of which I have problem with. It was really only the generalizations he made on the first page that infuriated me for some reason. I guess you can all go back up to the top of this rant and click on the article link (if you haven’t done so already) and read it for yourself. I have a real problem with ignorance, especially in those who assume a mantel of authority.


    About the only useful thing he said was this… “They [Jewish children] often learn far more about how Jews were burned at the stake for their faith rather than how Abraham’s faith in G-d burned with a fiery intensity.” If there was anything of value in the entire article, this was it. Though it was aimed at how many modern Jews define themselves based on the Holocaust rather than by their religious faith, I think it can also be applied to how Pagans (& witches) view themselves based on the “burning times” and the Inquisition.


    We (all people of all religions) need to give up the past. The past is not who we are. While it is true that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it, it is also true that we cannot live in the past. These things that happened to our ancestors cannot be undone. We should not let the distant past control us or flavor our opinions of people who may share the same religions as those who persecuted our predecesors but who could not possibly have been alive in those times. Letting ourselves be defined by events that happen to us rather than the choices we make in life makes us into things rather than people. In terms of how I interact with the world, I’d rather be a who than a what.

  • In keeping with my previous post, I received this news article in my email and decided to share it. This article touches on Hussein and Bin Laden, but it is really more about women’s rights -which should be the real issue in the Middle East before anything else. The American governement thinks it’s so important it should decide policy for every other country, but they don’t care about individuals, only what will benefit them the most (them… not us). They build up the power base of people like Saddam and Bin Laden and many others before them in other countries, and then they tear them down again when their little robots get too powerful. And who is left to pay? Not the individuals the government goes after, but all the citizens of their countries. How fair is that? Especially when those same citizens never benefited from the US the way the individuals the US “adopted” did.


    But the article below is really not about governments or policy. Not really. It’s about women. Religion is one thing, but abuse is quite another. As Nawal al-Saadawi points out, nowhere in the Koran does it insist upon female veiling, censorship, or castration. Women are shells… slaves… brood mares. It’s truly abominable what they go through over there. It’s no wonder that the female suicide rate is so high in the Middle East. I am glad to be an American, but only for this reason.


    Even though I have heard that some immigrants have brought the practice of female genital mutilation here. I shudder to think of little girls coming to our “free” country, only to face the same horror they so lately escaped.


    The government is so keen on civil rights and protecting the innocent. Slavery is supposed to be something that humanity practiced in the past.


    So when is someone going to do something about the slavery still practiced in the Middle East? My personal motto has always been fair and equal treatment for all people of any race, creed, or SEX. I know that I cannot expect everyone in the world to agree with me on every subject, but some things should just be obvious to all people. shouldn’t they?


    A lot of cruelty in the world could be prevented if all people had the capacity or imagination to put themselves in the other person’s place. If only these men who mistreat women could be made to understand what it would be like if they were women themselves, changes would occur pretty darn quick. But it’s like that old joke, if men were the ones who gave birth, we’d be extinct in a generation. (Apologies to any compassionate males reading this! lol)


    *********************** 


    Has one of feminism’s great voices been drowned out?
    Egypt’s Nawal al-Saadawi says her message has been stifled, coopted


    http://www.dailystar.com.lb/features/01_03_04_c.asp 


    Ursula Lindsey – Special to The Daily Star


    CAIRO: From the balcony of her 14th-floor apartment, Nawal al-Saadawi looks out over the working-class neighborhood of Shubra, the Mahad Nasr Hospital and the Nile winding its way into the greener distances north of Cairo. It’s an appropriately sweeping view for someone who has always looked far beyond narrow, inherited perspectives. Yet these days Saadawi, Egypt’s pre-eminent feminist writer, keeps the shutters mostly drawn, saying the long hours she spends typing at the computer have made bright light painful to her eyes. Seated in her dim and modest living room, fulminating against local and international powers, Saadawi almost seems trapped in her pinnacle.


    It’s something she comments on herself. “Women are not liberated here … I am not liberated. I am in a cage. In my country, I am in a prison without bars.”


    Saadawi complains that she has been ostracized by the Egyptian government.


    “If I cannot speak on the TV, if I cannot write in the big newspapers, if I cannot speak on the radio, if I cannot teach in Cairo University … what’s this?” she asks.


    This unwilled silence is all the more frustrating for someone with so much to say. Speaking a propos of the recent ban on the veil in French schools, Saadawi is adamant that women who choose to wear the veil are the victims of “false consciousness,” of “brainwashing.” If she had a chance to speak to one of the young demonstrators wearing a tri-color veil in the streets of Paris, she “would tell her this is not your identity and not your religion. Because I am also from a Muslim background and I am not veiled and my identity is not to be veiled or to be circumcised


    “There are some people and some feminists, even in the US and England, who think that to respect multiculturalism and pluralism and democracy and authentic identity ­ they approve of the veil and circumcision. Because they think that the veil and female circumcision is part of our identity. It is an ignorance of Islam. The veil is not Islamic at all. Nothing in Islam refers to covering the head.”


    Saadawi seems irritated by the word “identity.”


    Warming to her subject, she exclaims, “What is the relationship of my identity to what I put on my head? Is your identity your hat?


    “The scarf has become a political symbol,” she continues, “of the political powers, of political Islam. The fight over the ban of the veil in France is a political fight, related to elections in France and the political powers in Egypt and other Islamic countries. It has nothing to do with identity of women or morality or even Islam.”


    Saadawi also has a lot to say about Iraq these days. Her capacity for indignation hasn’t diminished over time.


    “We are living in a world of deception,” she cries. “I was reading the newspaper today, and everything that George Bush says, or Kofi Anan, is all lies … Kofi Anan should punish George Bush. He should put him on trial as a war criminal, not talk with him and obey him and go to Iraq. Where are the sanctions (against the US)?”


    Saadawi lays a great amount of blame for the region’s problems on the US.


    “The damage of Saddam Hussein to the Iraqi people is much less than the damage of the US,” she says, going on to add that Osama bin Laden “was created by the US and given power by the US. And Al-Qaeda. And the Taleban. Who are the Taleban? Who gave power to the Taleban? The US gave power to bin Laden, to Saddam Hussein to fight Iran, and to the Taleban.”


    Saadawi was born in the early 1940s in the village of Kafr Tahla and grew up in relatively progressive middle class family. A bright young girl getting top grades at school and writing poetry by the moonlight late at night, she seems to have been preternaturally determined to escape the feminine role assigned her. Like her brothers and sisters, she went to university, where she studied medicine and worked as a doctor before focusing more on her role as a writer and activist.


    In the 41 books she has written ­ among them Daughter of Isis, Woman at Point Zero, God Dies by the Nile, The Circling Song, and The Fall of the Imam ­ she elaborates again and again on the theme of female oppression, a subject she first tackled when as a boarding school student she wrote, directed and acted in a clandestine play about an unwanted pregnancy. She has distinguished herself for the courage with which she straightforwardly addressed such “shameful” subjects as the widespread occurrence of female circumcision, molestation, incest and harassment.


    In her book The Hidden Face of Eve , she writes that “education of female children is therefore transformed into a slow process of annihilation, a gradual throttling of her personality and mind, leaving intact only the outside shell … A girl who has lost her personality, her capacity to think independently and to use her own mind, will do what others have told her and will become a toy in their hands and a victim of their decisions.”


    Saadawi has never hesitated to indict religious or political leaders for manipulating concepts of honor, tradition, Islam or morality to deprive Arab women of their rights. And both temporal and religious powers have struck back.


    Under the late President Anwar Sadat she lost her post as editor in chief of Health magazine and as assistant secretary-general of Egypt’s Medical Association. She was imprisoned  at the end of Sadat’s presidency as part of a general crackdown on the opposition. She based a play, Twelve Women in Kanater, on her three months spent in jail.


    “Our regime, this local regime, I am resisting all the time, up till today,” she says. “And that’s why I’m at home. I could have been a prime minister, or the minister of health, of anything. I could have been the editor of Al-Ahram. But why am I at home or living in exile, teaching in (foreign universities)? Why can’t I teach in my country, in Cairo University? Because I am speaking up … I am speaking my mind. I cannot submit to power.”


    This includes the power of the sacred. “Women are oppressed by all religions,” she says, “because they are patriarchal, religions … God is a male god of the sky … You cannot have a monopoly of power in heaven and democracy on earth … Since the evolution of one male sky god, you started to have a dictatorship in heaven and on earth.”


    In 1993, Saadawi and her husband Sherif Hatata went into self-imposed exile after she had been put on “a fundamentalist death list.” As recently as 2001, after she returned to Egypt, her comments on religion ­ in this case, critiquing some customs of the Hajj as remnants of “paganism” ­ led an enterprising Cairene lawyer, Nabih Wahsh, to file a hisba lawsuit against her. This is a rare form of legal action, which can be brought by a third party to separate a married couple if one of the spouses is suspected of apostasy. Saadawi was interviewed by a judge and Wahsh lost his case, but not after a good amount of media fanfare. Saadawi is effectively considered beyond the pale by most Egyptians, men and women.


    “The women who speak up, they close them, as happened with us in 1991,” she said, referring to the closure of the Arab Women Solidarity Association, which she founded in 1981 and which was the latest of her projects to be quashed, after a visit to Iraq in 1991 to protest the pending US invasion.


    “We have hundreds of NGOs, but they are governmental. We call them GONGOs … because if they are really NGOs, and not governmental, they must have the power to criticize the government. They say yes, yes, yes. And all of them work with (first lady) Suzanne Mubarak.”


    Saadawi mocks what she sees as the government’s hypocritical cooptation of the feminist movement, a choice dictated by foreign pressure and no genuine interest in women’s advancement, because, she says: “If they liberate half the society, women, they must liberate the other half, men.”


    “Suzanne Mubarak started the Women’s Council. How can you liberate women though the government? It’s like the Council of Human Rights. It’s ridiculous! The government established the Human Rights Council.” Saadawi laughs loudly. “My God! To punish itself!”


    Furthermore, Saadawi, who in her books gives several graphic accounts of her own circumcision at age 6, remains unconvinced by either the practical gains of the current anti-FGM campaign or its usefulness to the advancement of women.


    “Female circumcision is really separated from economic and mental and political circumcision. If you veil women, and you beat women and you starve women, and then you say, ‘but I am not going to cut your clitoris,’ this is ridiculous.”