Since my dreams were once again interrupted by my inconsiderate family (and nextdoor neighbor childred home from school because of the snow), I guess I’ll take this opportunity to post some “public service announcements” on this, the inaugural date of our faux president.

Actor, director and conservationist Robert Redford has been a member of NRDC’s board for 30 years. Recently, he sent out the message below urging Americans to protest President Bush’s plan to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to massive oil development.
Redford urges Americans to call on their senators and representative to vote against any bill that would plunder the Arctic Refuge for oil company profits, and instead to support tougher fuel economy standards and other measures that would reduce our country’s dangerous reliance on Persian Gulf oil. He also asks BioGems Defenders to help mobilize millions of Americans by forwarding his message to friends, family members and colleagues.
If you’ve already received Robert Redford’s message and forwarded it on, thank you. If not, you can send it to your friends by filling in the information below. Then, if you haven’t already sent a message to your representatives in Congress, please do so today (follow the link to the action page after you forward the letter).
Dear Friend, No one voted on Election Day to destroy the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. But President Bush is now claiming a mandate to do exactly that. Congressional leaders are pushing for a quick vote that would turn America’s greatest sanctuary for Arctic wildlife into a vast, polluted oil field. Even worse, they are planning to avoid public debate on this devastating measure by hiding it in a must-pass budget bill. Please go to SaveBiogems.org right now and send a message telling your U.S. senators and representative to reject this sneak attack on the Arctic Refuge. And please forward my message to your friends, family and colleagues. We must mobilize millions of Americans in opposition as quickly as possible. Don’t believe for a second that the president is targeting the Arctic Refuge for the sake of America’s energy security or to lower gas prices at the pump. President Bush knows full well that oil drilled in the Arctic Refuge would take ten years to get to market and would never equal more than a paltry one or two percent of our nation’s daily consumption. Simply put, sacrificing the crown jewel of our wildlife heritage would do nothing to reduce gas prices or break our addiction to Persian Gulf oil. But if the raid on the Arctic Refuge isn’t really about gas prices or energy security, then what is it about? It’s the symbolism. The Arctic Refuge represents everything spectacular and everything endangered about America’s natural heritage. It embodies a million years of ecological serenity . . . a vast stretch of pristine wilderness . . . an irreplaceable birthing ground for polar bears, caribou and white wolves. It is the greatest living reminder that conserving nature in its wild state is a core American value. It stands for every remnant of wilderness that we, as a people, have wisely chosen to protect from the relentless march of bulldozers, chain saws and oil rigs. And that’s why the Bush administration is dead set on destroying it. By unlocking the Arctic Refuge, they hope to open the door for oil, gas and coal giants to invade our last and best wild places: our western canyonlands, our ancient forests, our coastal waters, even our national monuments. This is the real agenda behind the raid on the Arctic Refuge and the entire Bush-Cheney energy plan: to transfer our public estate into corporate hands so it can be liquidated for a quick buck. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) admitted as much when he said this battle over the Arctic Refuge is really a fight over whether energy exploration will be allowed in similarly sensitive areas in the future. “It’s about precedent,” Rep. DeLay said. I take him at his word. If we let the president and Congress plunder the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for the sake of oil company profits, then no piece of our natural heritage will be safe from wholesale destruction. Please go to SaveBiogems.org and tell your senators and representative they have no mandate to destroy the Arctic Refuge. Then please be sure to forward this message to as many people as you can. And thank you for speaking out at this critical time. Sincerely, Robert Redford Board of Trustees Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) . . . BioGems: Saving Endangered Wild Places A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council www.savebiogems.org
********* ********* *********
Bush isn’t the only perpetrator of harm against the environment, though he does make it easier for others to follow suit by his example. And what many people fail to take into account is that what harms our environment will sooner or later harm us.
Even when ecological damage is not intended, human disruption of the envirnment can have unforseen affects. Take the former Lake Owens in Southern California for instance. At its peak, it was a 200-square-mile perennial lake. It is now an extreme example to the world of the destabilizing effect of surface-water extraction in desert regions. Have you ever heard of it? I hadn’t. Owens River was diverted in 1913 to the city of Los Angeles, and by the mid-1920s Owens Lake was dry. The dry lake bed is the single largest source of particulate-matter pollution in the United States. The dust contains carcinogens such as nickel, cadmium, and arsenic, as well as sodium, chlorine, iron, calcium, potassium, sulfur, aluminum, and magnesium. During windstorms, the toxic dust has been tracked by satellite some 155 miles to the south into the Los Angeles area. Air pollution around the dry lake bed has reached 25 times the level acceptable under national clean-air standards.
********* ********* *********
Beyond our impact on the environment, even when a company tries to make a product that has as little impact on the environment as possible, a few years later, they turn around and undo their good work. In 1999, Ford created an experimental electric Ranger to test new battery and vehicle technologies. Now that hybrids are all the rage, they’re trying to recall all this electric trucks in favor of a new hybrid. To quote one enthusiat: “Hybrids are better than nothing, but they’re a Band-Aid for the real problem: Detroit’s oil dependence.” Ford blames it on Government regulations… saying the government waver that allowed the pilot program has expired and they must pull all electric vehicles from the road.
The real issue seems to be that electric cars cause $0 in operating costs and 0 in environmental pollution while hybrids require $$ for gasoline and cause less pollution than a regular car, but obviously quite a lot more than an electric car.
:: cough cough :: kickbacks :: cough cough ::
********* ********* *********
Just so you don’t think I’m picking entirely on America here… Apparently Tony Blair’s been sneaky lately. Not surprising considering how he and Bush have become such good buddies over the past four years. Apparently it’s come to light that he secretly tried to dismiss key global warming targets. This in the face of his use of global warming as a central point of his presidency.
********* ********* *********
And this is just shocking… L’Oreal and Revlon have agreed to eliminate chemicals suspected of causing cancer, birth defects and infertility from their products, including a common plasticizer in nail polish? Wow. I knew there was a reason I didn’t wear makeup aside from my sensative skin. Apparently my body was telling me something. Under pressure from various groups, Revlon Inc. and L’Oreal USA promised to adopt a new European Union anti- toxics rule. The European Parliament and the European Council jointly passed the rule in September, banning hundreds of known or probable carcinogens, mutagens or reproductive toxicants from perfume, makeup, hair dye and other cosmetics. Scientists are assessing additional chemicals for possible inclusion on the list, such as formaldehyde and aromatic amines from coal tar, which are used in some brown and black hair dyes. Geee, formaldehyde and coal tar…yah think?
********* ********* *********
At any rate, most, though not all of these articles were found at the Grist, and if you have not heard of it, I suggest you acquaint yourself with it. It is one of the best environmental magazines online.