1. Do you think suffering improves a person's ethical outlook? How?
I think that suffering can improve a person's ethical outlook but that it depends very much on the person. From my own point of view (as someone who has a strong sense of ethics and who has suffered), I think that a person must be capable of introspection and compassion. For a person to behave in an ethical fashion, they must be able to see a reason to behave ethically, especially when so few around us do. Questions of right and wrong are moot when most available examples are of the wrong sort. To then choose to be ethical in the face of so much wrongness, a person must be able to look within themselves to examine how their suffering has made them feel and thus make a conscious decision to not cause suffering in others no matter how the majority may behave. A person who is incapable of superimposing their own experiences on others is more likely to act selfishly because they will see no reason to treat others better than they, themselves, have been treated. People who have suffered in life and choose to behave ethically, even after being so wronged, probably have the strongest ethical outlook of any one. For those who have been wronged, a strong ethical outlook is like a badge of honor, an act of defiance. By adopting a strong moral foundation in the face of their suffering, they are saying that they will in no way be like those who have wronged them.
2. What responsibility does each person have for other people - and for the state of the world?
Everyone is responsible for everyone else, and everyone is responsible for the state of the world. No one can live another person's life for them, but despite being individuals, we do not live in a vacuum. We cannot force others to be good, but we can all lead by example. If we see something that causes pain or is detrimental, to our fellow man or to future generations, we should attempt to intervene. If we see someone hurt or hurting, we should attempt to help. Wouldn't we want someone to help us if we were hurt or hurting? Knowing what we would want in a similar situation resolves the extent of our responsibility to others. If we all gave to others those things which we would need for ourselves in the same situation, no one would ever Need for anything and there would be no reason to discuss responsibility.
When no one takes responsibility, then we get the world in which we live today. We walk down streets where trash is quite evident, but most of us never pick it up, even if it is lying right next to the garbage can where we conscientiously throw our own garbage away. What good does it do anyone if we throw our own trash away but leave the anonymous, ownerless trash lying at our feet? We can't expect that others will do what we leave undone. No one is going to pick up the slack, so we might as well get off our couch potato butts and start pulling our own weight before things get any worse. If everyone did their part, there would be no homeless, no one would go hungry, and while suffering can never be completely irradicated, at least in our lifetimes, it doesn't have to be the only thing that some people know in life. But very few people take responsibility for themselves, let alone the state of the world around them. It's a pity really.
Responsibility to me is equivalent to love. I love the world and the people who live in it (even if they often make me unhappy), but that doesn't mean that I try to control their actions or make them conform to my ideals. I don't presuppose that I must own what I care for. It's my world and you're all my people, but it's your world and I belong to you too. It's my responsibility to treat others as I would like to be treated and to respect their decisions as I would hope they'd respect mine. We live in a pluralistic world with multiple view points. We cannot and will not always agree on everything, but if there is one thing we should agree upon, it is that we are responsible to those things which we love. If we refuse to take care of who and what we love, then can we really say we love at all?
January 8th
Justitia, the Roman goddess of Justice, is often portrayed evenly balancing both scales and a sword while wearing a blindfold, but she was originally depicted holding a cornucopia and scales. She was also sometimes portrayed holding the fasces (a bundle of rods around an ax symbolizing judicial authority) in one hand and a flame in the other (symbolizing truth).
This is the 24th day of Mechir in the Egyptian calendar. It is the date of a Festival of Isis and celebrates the Birth of Aion.
Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers was born in 1854 and died 1918. As a prominent occult scholar, he was an author and a leader of the occult revival in the late 1880’s. He had a life long fascination with magic, mysticism and Celtic symbolism that led him to hold high office in the S.R.I.A. (Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia). He, together with Dr. William Wynn Westcott and Dr. William Woodman was a co-founder of the influential occult Order known as the “Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.”
Galileo Galilee died this day in 1642. During his life, he was condemned for speaking the truth, that the world was round and revolved around the sun and was not, as the Church asserted, the center of the universe.
Born Violet Mary Firth, Dion Fortune died on this day in 1946. Like Samuel Mathers, she was also a founding member of the Golden Dawn.
Recent Comments